Minister Peter Bunting Labelled “Mr. Fake News”

peter bunting

National Security Minister Robert Montague said to Peter Bunting; “Do better young man…everybody who is associated with National Security is calling him Mr Fake News. I do not support name calling.”

Robert Montague the National Security Minister on Wednesday, April 26, 2017, addressed false assertions made by his opposition counterpart, Peter Bunting, a week earlier in the House of Representatives; during his contribution to the Sectoral Debate.

Montague during his presentation said;

Mr. Speaker, the Member from Central Manchester made some unfortunate remarks last week. Very unfortunate. In his quest for headlines he shouted and pontificated “fake news”. Since then, everybody who is associated with National Security,  is calling him Mr Fake News. I do not support name calling.

Mr Speaker, I have no wish to embarrass or humiliate the young man from Central Manchester.  Sir, I will only lay out the facts.

Mr Speaker it was not all doom and gloom. He made at least two points where one thought he could have done more. He criticised me on the legislative agenda we had planned. I concede. Our performance was not as robust as it should have been.

On the matter of turning firearm holders into special District Constables; during the consultation of the final draft for the proposal, the technical staff raised a number of questions, e.g. whether they would fall under the remit of INDECOM. Further research and work is taking place. Mr Speaker these and other matters we thought the young man would have dived into because we are open to suggestions and ideas. Instead the young man did not heed

Dr. Phillips advice to students of UTech “Keep away from selfish, narrow politics”.

Mr. Speaker he went on and tried to score political points.


Montague took excerpts from Peter Bunting Sectoral Debate speech and counteracted each.

Below are the contractions:

Counteraction one:

“Last week the American media pointed to many policy reversals on campaign promises e.g. 1) Avoiding the use of military force in Syria  2) Labelling China a currency manipulator 3) On the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) being obsolete.”

Mr. Speaker, what right does the member have to use the Parliament to negatively comment on the Internal Affairs of a friendly country?

Mr Speaker, is it normal to use the Parliament to attack and question in a subtle way, the President of the United States of America or any other leader? It is actually against established diplomatic protocols.  It is also against the Standing Orders of Parliament.

The United States is our biggest partner in National Security. Why attack them?

Do you know what you are doing? Do you know the possible effect on many Jamaican businesses and families if we pick a quarrel with our biggest trading partner? Our oldest ally in the fight against crime? A country where thousands of Jamaicans call home.

Do you know what you are doing? Have you thought of the effect on the many Jamaicans living in the USA as a result of your loose comments?

The United States Government spends millions of dollars on Jamaica’s National Security Architecture, training, donation of assets, sharing of intelligence, assistance with our maritime space and you a former Minister of National Security are being so careless with the lives of thousands of Jamaicans.

Do better young man!

I am sure the United States Embassy will say all is well. But, that’s what good Ambassadors do. We have an excellent one from Washington.

Counteraction two:

“He unfortunately and ill-advisedly, claimed that the DNA regulations were not crafted or published.”

The Jamaican Gazette of Friday, March 31, 2017, published same; pass a copy to Bunting.

I do not wish to embarrass him. I am just laying out the facts. Destroying the “Fake News,” with great fanfare he stated no DNA registry. Well, what say you now?

Counteraction three:

“Mr. Speaker, the honourable gentleman claimed we have not spent the billions promised. Sir on Page 6 of his speech is an extract of the yellow budget book (The Estimates of Expenditure) that he held up. He did not put it on the screen.”

Why? Because it showed the revised estimate increased by not 1, not 2, but over 3 billion dollars. 3 Billion dollars. 3 billion not millions, but billions.

Yet, he artfully left it out. Sad, sad.

I wish to quote from a former a Prime Minister, the most Hon. Michael N. Manley; “Dem Lie.” 

The money was used to purchase 2 ships and a plane. I have the invoices here and will give him copies.

Counteraction four:

“The promise of police dogs.”

He well knows that we can only buy dogs from rabies-free countries. We must respect the process and laws of our partners. We cannot go and demand dogs or any other goods, we have to make the request and wait. He never even placed an order for dogs. We have the money, we have the need but we must be respectful of laws of countries with which we partner.

Counteraction five:

“In his speech on Page 7, at the very first line, he left out a part of the sentence “Nor has the new 300-bed facility at Tamarind Farm been commissioned.”

You know why he left it out? Tell them, Hon. Member, Tell the Speaker.

The former Minister of National Security, just before me, built the new wing, and I say congrats, beautiful building, well built, we can name it after him as is.

It has no sewage treatment facility.

Honourable Member for Central Manchester, consult the former Minister, get the facts before you speak. We cannot use the facility until the sewage plant is completed. This error of yours has used up millions of dollars that could have bought more cars.

Counteraction six:

He claimed that the company which won the bid to supply the motor cars and pickups, O’Brien’s International Car Sales, did not import any motor vehicles for the “last two years” in his written speech, but he said 5 years during his presentation.”

Sir, the Trade Board has informed that O’Brien’s in 2016 was issued with 27 permits.  In 2015, 16 permits; 2014, 64 permits, and in 2013, 206 permits.

In addition, the Ministry of Tourism knows this company well, as it is qualified to receive duty concessions on motor cars for rental and O’Brien’s has accessed this facility.  We have letters from the said Ministry for May, June and July of 2015.

The company has imported cars as these C87 Customs forms show.  These are from 2014 and 2015.
Coincidentally, the price in the successful bid for the Axio Corollas for the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) is $1.3m. Do you want me to stop?

Counteraction seven:

“Mobile Stations: He questions where they are?”

Sir, the Ministry of National Security now follows the procurement guidelines. They are being built out now, here in Jamaica not imported from overseas. “Dem Lie.”

Counteraction eight:

“The promise to distribute Book of Rules to every police officer was not done.”

Police rule book (Book of Rules) was published electronically and has been made available to Force members and indeed any member of the public who cares to examine. It has been available on the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF) website under the resources section since August 2016.

Again “Dem Lie!”

Counteraction nine:

“He criticised me for calling “Tief, Rapist, and Murderers;  Dutty Criminals.”

Mr. Speaker will the Member tell me what term I should use? What term better describes them?

  • Mr. Speaker, I thought the gentleman would come here and thank the administration for paying the $309 million to the retired officers who could not get paid during his period as the minister.
  • I thought he would be delighted for the officers who have seen 17 police stations repaired.
  • I thought he would be ecstatic to know that we bought a brand new coaster bus for the Police Federation, a new bus for hardworking staff at the ministry, 2500 ballistic helmets, 3000 ballistic vests, 250 motorbike helmets, 800 beds, 15 million for District Constable Uniforms, 100 combat boots for ladies, and 50 mobile radios.
  • $22 million dollars to purchase raincoats, six generators, and fire extinguishers.

Mr Speaker, we must not use National Security to push our partisan political agenda.

I am hopeful that the young man regrets his actions and will do better research in his next portfolio. He has failed here and let down his side.

Paraphrasing the Most Hon. Michael Manley: “Dem Lie, dem lie, dem lie!”

Congratulations to the PNP delegates they did not vote for that Peter.


Leave a Comment